PROMOTE THE HOBBY

PROMOTE THE HOBBY THROUGH OPEN MINDED EXCHANGE OF KNOWLEDGE AND IDEAS - Share your experiences as a breeder or novice both good and bad. Pass on your experiences and share results with the next generation. A successful breeder will be remembered for such efforts...

Sunday, June 19, 2016

Has the Robson Guppy truly disappeared?


Has the Robson Guppy truly disappeared?
By Alan S. Bias 6.16.16


© Alan S. Bias - June 16, 2016

Permission granted for nonprofit reproduction or duplication of photos and text in entirety with proper credit for learning purposes only.


Reprinted from:  http://www.reef2rainforest.com/2016/06/16/has-the-robson-guppy-truly-disappeared/

Robson Guppy drawn from early standard descriptions
based on wild-type color and pattern.

In the year 1937 A. E. Robson of High Gate, London, England introduced to United Kingdom (UK) members of the Guppy Breeder's Society (GBS) a new strain which would become known among Domestic Guppy breeders as the "Robson Guppy". A strain produces a visible phenotype; a grouping of multiple traits. The Robson strain incorporated two unique traits in females at the time. First, the phenotypical structure of the dorsal resembled that of males from other early strains, still bred today, including the Speartail. While the caudal structure resembled that of the Roundtail, also still bred today. The primary noted difference with Roundtail being a long tapering dorsal with extension well into the caudal round, as compared to early and modern Roundtail's which possess a much shorter and rectangular dorsal that does not extend into the caudal round. In example below a Robson type male.


Robson type female with Tapering Dorsal and black finnage.
Photo courtesy Carl Groenewegen

Second, and most importantly, the Robson females expressed color in finnage. While this may seem inconsequential today, the Robson females are documented as being one of the first captive-bred strains to express either sex-link or autosomal linked color in finnage. Albeit, melanophores and not actual color pigment. In example below, a modern Black Moscow female with black finnage and extended non-tapering dorsal.



Robson colored female, with non-tapering extended dorsal.
Photo courtesy Desmond Koh
Robson male from some years ago, photo courtesy of Stephen Elliot
DESCRIPTION & HISTORY

At the time, scientific research involving Poecilia reticulata was still in infancy. Most notable researchers at the time were O. J. Winge, L. J. Blacher, Johs. Schmidt, C. P. & E. F. Haskins, J. P. Druzba, V. F. & A. I. Natali, and V. S. Kirpichnikov, to name a few of the more notable, who were doing studies near exclusively on captive bred wild-caught populations. In wild-type Mother Nature imposes many restrictions which best define "fitness traits" geared towards survival of P. reticulata as a prey species. One of which is "color neutral / clear caudal" females. Above lateral line female coloration is specifically adapted for camouflage from above, and below lateral line female coloration is adapted for camouflage from below. While minimal finnage appears clear to the naked eye and in the shape of a genetic roundtail.

The available published research at the time suggested wild-type females possessed little or no color pigment in genotype (XX-link), thus passed little color or pattern genotype to male offspring. However, when this information was disseminated to breeders by aquatic authors of the day, it mistakenly assumed the same results applied to wild-type results would also apply to domestic strains being developed. As A. E. Robson showed in 1937, this was not the case. His simple strain, by modern standards, proved P. reticulata females were capable of expressing color in captive bred domestic strains, extracted from traits existing unexpressed in wild-type. It would also help corroborate later research showing females were:

1. Capable of naturally possessing color in genotype (XX-link and autosomal),

2. Capable of acquiring color through chromosomal crossover (Y to X-link) during meiosis,

3. Capable of androgen based expression of color pigments.


By the early 1950's researchers were showing in captive bred wild-caught populations what breeders had demonstrated in their tanks fifteen years prior. That being, in native high predation locations much of male color pattern was preserved and passed not by Y-link inheritance, but rather X-link and autosomal. Flashy Y-link males gain benefit via female sexual selection preference in both low and high predation locales. Yet, suffer higher mortality in the latter. Therefore, it is not of benefit for males to pass high degrees of color / pattern and reflective qualities to all sons in the form of Y-link. The stage was set for development of the wide array of Domestic Guppy strains we see world-wide today.

It would be nearly another 10 years before the GBS recognized the Robson phenotype in its breeding standards of 1947. According to Klee, Robson females exhibited, "a large round jet-black tail and a black dorsal." The remainder of body and finnage coloration in Robson females was described as being blue iridophore and yellow Metal Gold (Mg), commonly seen in wild-type. Though possibly more pronounced? Males were described by Klee as, "lacking the black spots characteristic of the common guppy of the time, but they did have their tails and dorsal fins edged in black." It should be noted that more recent Robson type males (tapering dorsal & round caudal) express diversity of type found in color & pattern of modern short-tail strains. While those of earlier breeding’s were likely limited to “wild-type”, “multi” or “Vienna” body color and pattern. In example below, a male of Robson finnage type (tapering dorsal and round caudal) edged in black with modern Saddleback color and pattern.

Robson type male with Saddleback color & pattern.
Photo courtesy Gernot Kaden

While breeder lore indicates creation of the Robson strain involved the use of Cream (double recessive blond (b) + golden (g) females, Klee contradicted this belief, without substantiating, stating Robson infused "imported females that exhibit much black in their fins" into his gene pool.

While Robson Guppies were to be found in continental Europe, its core support came from breeders in the United Kingdom. The UK Federation of Guppy Breeder's Society (FGBS), successor to the GBS, standards defined the Robson in 1955 and 1961 as, "Caudal Fin - To be evenly rounded and free from any resemblance of a straight line or point. Dorsal Fin - To be long, slim, tapering to a point and extending beyond the Caudal peduncle. Standard Grey body only." As such, clearly defined Robson as a body style trait and not in regard to color or pattern. The FGBS was geared towards production of Short-tail Guppies.

The Robson Guppy, 1955 UK Federation of Guppy Breeder's Society standard.

In 1961, UK Fancy Guppy Association (FGA), successor to the FGBS, failed to recognize in its Standards Handbook the Robson Guppy as either a body type or color class. Instead, listed, "FEMALES, ALL VARIETIES, COLOURS on fins should be varied and brilliant. In revised 1967 standards had apparently seen the error in previous interpretation of the Robson phenotype by re-classifying prior standard from that of a "body / finnage type" to a "basic body colour". Which stated, "Robson - Permitted only in the grey standard basic body colour. The dorsal and caudal fins must be black and no other colour on the body or fins is allowed."

However, by doing so had set the course for continued declining interest and eventual demise of this 30 year old phenotype. From foundation to demise the FGA was founded and geared toward production of Broad-tail Guppies. By 1973 the Robson phenotype was no longer included in FGA standards for either color or body.

Asian Black Moscow female of Robson coloration, with tapering dorsal and minimal extension.
Photo courtesy 
曾皇傑 Tseng Huang Chieh
Asian Black Moscow female of Robson coloration, with tapering dorsal and minimal extension.
Photo courtesy 
曾皇傑 Tseng Huang Chieh


DISCUSSION & GENETICS

So what brought about the demise of the Robson phenotype as a strain recognized by formal Guppy Breeder Associations? As late as 1989, The UK Federation of Northern Aquarium Societies, in its publication, "A Simple Guide to Identification; Guppy (Fin Shapes), listed the Robson Guppy as a body type. The Robson was never formally recognized in North America by the American Guppy Association (AGA) or successor International Fancy Guppy Association (IFGA). Nor, was the Robson ever recognized in continental Europe by the Internationales Kuratorium Guppy Hochzucht (IKGH), active since 1981. From its creation in 1937 until the 1970's the Robson Guppy strain was primarily bred by breeders in the UK.

While the Robson Guppy created quite the stir in its heyday, it could not compete with changing breeder interests and new developments in their tanks. Interest during the 1950-60's was shifting from Swordtails and Short-tails to colorful new Broadtail strains. A standard limiting females to black coloration in finnage and none in body did not help in bolstering dwindling interest. Trying to locate photos of the Robson is like hunting a needle in a hay stack. Few, if any, seem to have been photographed by breeders in tanks or at shows. None of these breeders are active today. To date I have located only a single color plate indicative of a Robson male; see Madsen, J. M., (1975) Aquarium Fishes In Color. In example below, a male of Robson finnage type (tapering dorsal and round caudal) with modern Full Red color and pattern.

Robson type male with Full Red color & pattern.
Photo courtesy Gernot Kaden


Like most modern Domestic Guppy strains the Robson was likely not the result of a "new mutation", rather the product of X-link, Y-link and autosomal traits hidden in wild-type. More often than not these traits are in simple non-linked combination passed by males and females, rather than a true linked complex that is passed to offspring in a single event. They are identified in captive bred population’s subject only to selection imposed by breeders and not natural predation or female sexual selection preferences imposed on wild populations. Large scale mutations are rare and infrequent events, being almost immeasurable. Small scale mutations, on the other hand, are being recognized as frequent and common place. These occur on both the chromosomes and autosomes in the form of transpositions in small snippets of DNA. While producing new phenotypes, this may also foster instability seen in breeder results within “fixed strains.”

In the case of the Robson, it is primarily comprised of X-link &/or autosomal:

1. Concentration of black melanophores in finnage,

2. Tapering dorsal structure with extension.

While modern breeders still commonly associated the term "Robson" with a tapering dorsal in females, it should be remembered for its greatest impact. That being, the first documented expression of color in females as a result of X-link &/or autosomal genotype. This knowledge has allowed for the creation of all expressed female color in modern Domestic Guppy strains. How much as a direct result of Robson females? In all likelihood not that much. In domestic breeding situations it is commonplace for similar phenotypes to arise in multiple locations, just as it is in the wild.

It is feasible Robson genotype for colored finnage in females was used to further develop new strains. If so, most likely candidates are early European black and purple Veiltails. As the genetic foundation of these strains was initially developed in the 1950-60's using females with X-link &/or autosomal black melanophores in finnage. From which later Black strains have been produced, in example below, Asian and North American bred females.

Asian “Midnight Black Moscow Delta with non-tapering dorsal and extension.
Photo courtesy Desmond Koh
Asian Black Moscow female of Robson coloration, with tapering dorsal and no extension.
Photo courtesy Sun Lee
IFGA Black Delta with non-tapering dorsal and extension.
Photo courtesy Bryan Chin

Breeders should always keep in mind that regulation of color and pattern is considered generally distinct between body and finnage. Regulation between caudal and dorsal is often distinct, between strains. As is extension genetics, which allow for variation in lengths of finnage types through breeder selection.

Tapering dorsal is still very much common place in non-black finned Domestic Guppy strains to include: Lyretails, Swordtails, Speartails, Pintails, and even Roundtails. Though, standards worldwide frown on a Rountail tail guppy with a tapering dorsal. Yet, this still serves a purpose. In that it further demonstrates a tapering dorsal and finnage pigmentation was never in a linked complex in the Robson Guppy. Nor, is a tapering dorsal linked in complex to caudal shape, as each can pass independent of the other.

Swordtail female with Tapering Dorsal ca. 2004.
 Photo courtesy 顏威廉 William Yen

Red Double Sword female with Tapering Dorsal.
Photo by Alan S. Bias

Delta female with Tapering Dorsal.
Photo courtesy Carl Groenewegen
Asian X-link Double sword female with Tapering Dorsal.
Photo courtesy Gary Lee

So has the Robson Guppy truly disappeared from breeder tanks? As a strain defined by earlier standards, possibly. In contribution to current breeding's? Not likely, as all components are still found worldwide in many improved strains. Thus, with effort, could potentially be re-constituted in original form with well-defined breeding's.


NOTE: All photos by author or used with express permission of breeder / photographer.

CONTRIBUTORS: Stephen Elliot, Kettering, England.

REFERENCES:

FGA, (1961, 1967, 1973) Standards Handbooks, First Edition 1961, Revised 1967, Revised 1973.

FGBS, (1955, 1961) The Guppy Breeders's Standards Handbook, Seventh Edition, Rev. Jan., 1955, Eighth Edition, Rev. Jan., 1961.

Frazer-Brunner, A. (1953) The Guppy, The Aquarist, Reprinted 1953.

Haskins, C.P. & Haskins E. F. (1951) The Inheritance of Certain Color Patterns in Wild Populations of Lebistes reticulatus in Trinidad.

Klee, Albert J., (2003) The Guppy 1859-1967, Finley Aquatic Books.

Madsen, J. M., (1975) Aquarium Fishes In Color, Macmillan Publishing, Co.

Stoye, F. H., (1934) Color Breeding of Guppies, The Aquarium, Vol. III, No. 2, June 1934, pgs 32-33.

The Federation of Northern Aquarium Societies, (1989), A Simple Guide to Identification; Guppy (Fin Shapes).



************************************************

This years 19th World Guppy Contest (WGC) is being held in Vienna, Austria this coming August 22-28, 2016, http://www.worldguppycontest2016.com/.  This in followup to last years highly successful 18th WGC held in Tampa, Florida USA, by the Florida Guppy Club.  Held under the auspices of the World Guppy Association, /http://www.world-guppy.org/, WGC contests are traditionally rotated around the world each year.  I have wanted to attend a show hosted by the Austrian Club, one of the oldest in the world, since a teenager.  Now I will attend and have been humbled and honored with an invitation to judge the event.   This show promises attract breeders from around the world.  There is still time to plan a trip if within your means.



****************************
****************





















Page 1 of 12














Tuesday, April 5, 2016

Report on China Guppy Club Show, March 18-20, 2016

China Guppy Club Show,
March 18-20, 2016, Guangzhou China;
1st China – America Global Contest


© Alan S. Bias (4.4.2016)
Permission granted for nonprofit reproduction or duplication of photos and text with proper credit for learning purposes only.  All photos courtesy of China Guppy Club, unless otherwise credited.

Remember you can click on any photos to enlarge.

JUDGING TEAM
Pictured from right to left:  Alan S. Bias (USA), Wang Zuo wei “Wind” (China), Frank Chang (USA), Eddie Lee (Taiwan), Hwang zong (China), Tsen hwang-jei (Taiwan), Anshin Liu (Taiwan).

After what seemed like months of preparation fellow IFGA member Carl Groenewegen and myself set off on our two week tour of China and Taiwan.  The trip to Guangzhou, China itself comprised over 40 hours of driving, flights and layovers.  The return trip would be nearly 50 hours from Taipei, Taiwan.  Upon arrival in Guangzhou, China, we were greeted at the airport by my friend and president of the China Guppy Club Wang Zuo wei.  Better known to most Guppy breeders around the world as “Wind Wang”.

The next two days were comprised of a world-wind of tours to include YiDing Aquarium Factory and the world’s largest Aquarium Fish Wholesale and Retail Market.  YiDing produces over 100,000 handmade tanks in a multitude of configurations each year.  Many of which are seamless glass fronts, utilizing a heated process to bend the glass.  The live fish market covered many blocks and housed literally hundreds of vendors and shops.  The sheer volume of fish numbers and species in itself was staggering.  The overall state of health of the fish and reptiles leaves much to be desired when compared to what the average American is used to seeing in retail outlets.

At the conclusion of each visit owners would treat us to a sit-down with their favorite varieties of hot tea.  At midday a large meal and at the end of each day a dinner consisting of 10-15 dishes of local cuisine.  Over the course of a week we rarely had the same dish twice.

Fellow IFGA breeder and judge Frank Chang, who had left the States a week earlier to visit family in Beijing, China, joined us in Guangzhou the day before start of the show.  Thus, comprising International Fancy Guppy Association (IFGA) members in attendance as Carl Groenewegen (OH), Frank Chang (CA) and Alan S. Bias (WV).  The show itself being supported by entries from IFGA members:  Simeon Bonev (MI), Dr. John Flack (IL), Joe Mason (FL), Gary & Tim Mousseau (MI), Carl Groenewegen (OH), Frank Chang (CA) and Alan S. Bias (WV).

IFGA member contingency.  Pictured from right to left:
  Alan S. Bias (USA), Frank Chang (USA), Carl Groenewegen USA). Photo courtesy Alan S. Bias.

The China Guppy Club  show (an IFGA member club) was held in conjunction with the GIAS Aquatic Expo.  The size of the facilities were immense to say the least.  During the course of events I was informed that this event is actually the smaller of two held yearly.  With the larger being housed next door in a much large venue utilizing 4-5 five stories.  Show tanks were both individually lit and additionally from building overhead lighting.  Along with the Guppy Show,  a Betta and Skate / Ray shows were also held.  Additional to this were large events for turtles, snake, reptiles and spiders.  Numerous displays of Asian Arowana and Koi were also present.

One of the more frequent comments from attendees of the 17th World Guppy Contest held 2014 in Tianjin, China was the age of those attending the show.  I found little different at this event with the vast majority being in their 20's and 30's.  Interest in breeding guppies has never been greater.

Photos Alan S. Bias.

The show itself was to be judged under World Guppy Association Standards (WGA).  Any issues arising before, during and after judging deferred  to WGA standards when possible, and when not were addressed by local rules or Judging Team discretion.  For those with further interest in WGA standards here is a link to them:  http://www.world-guppy.org/wgc-category.html  (last checked 4.4.2016).

Prior to the start of the show all entries were sorted, logged and entered on show forms the night before.  The total number of entries for the show would slightly exceed 350 pairs, or 700+ fish.  At this time by consensus of the Judging Team it was decided to prejudge all entries before actual benching of entries the next day.  This occurred on the morning of Friday 3.18.16, and would reduce the average number of entries in each class from 20 to 10 or more.  Later in the day each judge would individually prejudge remaining fish in each class, selecting their preferred top three fish.  From the total votes for each class a total of four fish would be selected for final judging.

Final judging occurred during the afternoon, with each judge pointing in full, according to WGA standards, the top 4 fish in each of the 18 classes.  Each judge individually scored a total of 72 fish.  Only a couple of minor issues arose during judging and each was in the end resolved by consensus of the Judging Team.  Awards were given for 1st, 2nd, 3rd place in each class.

Points were tabulated that night for both class placement and Best of Show (BOS).  High and low scores for each fish were excluded, and remaining scores were added together and divided by the number of remaining judges for an average score.  Best of Show was determined by the highest scoring pair from each of the class winners.  The point totals indicating a Crowntail male bred by 罗永雄 Luo Yongxiong (China) as winner of BOS.  Discussions were held by the Judging Team after concerns were expressed about a Crowntail being named BOS over delta entries.  According to best information this had not occurred in any prior shows.  A final decision was withheld until the next morning. 

The next morning the Judging Team held further discussion the the matter of BOS placement.  Consideration was given toward further judging all Class Champions against each other, along IFGA judging style.  In the end, by consensus, it was agreed to allow BOS standings to remain as indicated.  It being felt that each class winner had been judged to its own standard.  That to judge each class winner against another would only allow for individual breeder preferences to potentially bias the end result.  A sound decision on the part of all Judging Team members.

FIRST PLACE BEST OF SHOW (BOS)
Best of Show Crowntail male bred by 罗永雄 Luo Yongxiong (China)

I’d like to point out that this pair is now swimming in the tanks of Carl Groenewegen (USA).  Along with several other pairs gifted to him by breeder Luo Yongxiong after the show.

INITIAL MORNING PRE-JUDGING













AFTERNOON JUDGING


         





  






In final, I will take the liberty on behalf of IFGA members Frank Chang, Carl Groenewegen and myself, I would like to express my sincere thanks to our GIAS sponsors and host members of the China Guppy Club.  It was a genuine pleasure to represent not only the IFGA, but American breeders in general at this event.  Finally, to my friend Wind Wang, who approached me at the WGC in Tampa, Florida last year with an invitation to both attend and judge at this international event.   

            What follows are the final formal Show Results, and photos of each of the 18 class winners; 1st, 2nd, 3rd places.  It should be noted that many photos were taken after judging and do not give due justice to the males, as many delta’s were suffering from caudal breakdown resulting from un-aged water.   


CLASS WINNERS - 1ST, 2ND & 3RD PLACES

Class 1 – Blue Solid Delta 1st Place


Class 1 – Blue Solid Delta 2nd and 3rd Place

 
Class 2 – Red Solid Delta 1st Place


Class 2 – Red Solid Delta 2nd and 3rd Place

 
Class 3 – Half Black (Tuxedo) Delta 1st Place



Class 3 – Half Black (Tuxedo) Delta 2nd and 3rd Place

 
Class 4 – Grass Delta 1st Place


Class 4 – Grass Delta 2nd and 3rd Place

Class 5 – Mosaic Delta 1st Place


Class 5 – Mosaic Delta 2nd and 3rd Place

Class 6 – Snakeskin Delta 1st Place


Class 6 – Snakeskin Delta 2nd and 3rd Place

Class 7 – Albino Solid Delta 1st Place

 

Class 7 – Albino Solid Delta 2nd and 3rd Place

Class 8 – Variegated Delta 1st Place


Class 8 – Variegated Delta 2nd and 3rd Place

 
Class 9 – Others Delta 1st Place

 

Class 9 – Others Delta 2nd and 3rd Place

Class 10 – Swordtail Combined 1st Place

 

Class 10 – Swordtail Combined 2nd and 3rd Place

Class 11 – Roundtail 1st Place


Class 11 – Roundtail 2nd and 3rd Place

Class 12 – Special Tail (Largetail) 1st Place.  Photo by Alan S. Bias.


Class 12 – Special Tail (Largetail) 2nd and 3rd Place

 
Class 13 – Longfin Ribbon 1st Place

 

Class 13 – Longfin Ribbon 2nd and 3rd Place

 
Class 14 – Longfin Swallow 1st Place


Class 14 – Longfin Swallow 2nd and 3rd Place

 
Class 15 – Young Pair Solid Delta 1st Place

 

Class 15 – Young Pair Solid Delta 2nd and 3rd Place


Class 16 – Young Pair Solid Albino 1st Place



Class 16 – Young Pair Solid Albino 2nd and 3rd Place

 
Class 17 – Young Pair Variegated 1st Place


Class 17 – Young Pair Variegated 2nd and 3rd Place

Class 18 – Young Pair Variegated Albino 1st Place


Class 18 – Young Pair Variegated Albino 2nd and 3rd Place


***************************************************

The hospitality and sincere nature of the Chinese people during our travels were in themselves well worthy of a trip to the other side of the world…

*****************************
*******************

Click on blog photos to enlarge

Click on blog photos to enlarge